You’ve just wrapped up a lecture that felt a little flat, and you’re wondering if anyone else has tried that quick‑fire poll you slipped in at the end. On top of that, you search online, hoping to find a conversation about what worked, what didn’t, and why. That’s where the journal scholarship of teaching and learning steps in — not as a dusty archive, but as a living forum where teachers swap stories, test ideas, and build evidence together.
What Is Journal Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
At its core, the journal scholarship of teaching and learning (often shortened to JoSoTL) is a peer‑reviewed publication that focuses on the study of teaching practices in higher education. Unlike journals that prioritize theoretical models or discipline‑specific research, JoSoTL asks a simple question: What actually helps students learn, and how can we know?
Articles in this space tend to blend classroom experience with systematic inquiry. You’ll find case studies where a professor flipped a lab course, reflective essays that trace the evolution of a discussion technique, and small‑scale experiments that compare two versions of a quiz format. The common thread is a commitment to making teaching visible, testable, and improvable.
A Brief History
The first issue appeared in the early 2000s, born out of a growing movement that urged educators to treat their own classrooms as sites of research. Early editors wanted a venue where the messy, iterative nature of teaching could be documented without the pressure to produce grand, generalized theories. Over time, the journal has attracted contributors from community colleges, liberal arts schools, and research universities, creating a surprisingly diverse conversation about what works across contexts.
Who Reads It
Faculty members looking for fresh ideas, graduate students preparing to teach, instructional designers, and even administrators who want evidence‑based justification for professional‑development spending all turn to JoSoTL. The readership is deliberately broad because the journal assumes that good teaching insights can travel beyond the boundaries of a single discipline Simple, but easy to overlook..
Why It Matters / Why People Care
Teaching can feel isolating. When you read a piece in JoSoTL, you’re not just collecting tips; you’re seeing how someone else collected data, reflected on the results, and decided what to keep or change. Day to day, you spend hours crafting a syllabus, only to wonder whether the activities you chose are landing the way you hoped. That process turns anecdote into actionable knowledge.
Evidence Over Intuition
It’s tempting to rely on gut feeling — “I think the group work helped because the room was noisy.That's why ” But intuition can mislead. Practically speaking, the scholarship of teaching and learning pushes educators to ask: *Did the group work improve quiz scores? On the flip side, did it increase participation from quieter students? * By grounding decisions in observable outcomes, instructors can stop guessing and start refining.
Building a Community of Practice
When you publish a short reflection on a failed clicker experiment, you’re not just sharing a story; you’re inviting others to try it, tweak it, and report back. Over time, those iterative exchanges create a informal network of educators who learn from each other’s successes and missteps. That sense of community combats the burnout that often comes from feeling like you’re reinventing the wheel alone.
Influencing Policy and Support
Administrators love data. When a department can point to a JoSoTL article showing that a new peer‑review workflow reduced grading time by 20 %, it becomes easier to justify funding for workshops or technology upgrades. The journal, therefore, acts as a bridge between classroom innovation and institutional decision‑making.
How It Works (or How to Engage With It)
Engaging with JoSoTL isn’t limited to reading; you can contribute, comment, and even use its articles as teaching tools themselves. Below is a practical roadmap for anyone who wants to move from consumer to participant.
Finding Relevant Articles
Start with the journal’s website or a university library database. Use keywords that match your pain point — “active learning in large lectures,” “online discussion boards,” “feedback strategies for writing.” Because JoSoTL is interdisciplinary, you’ll often discover approaches from fields you hadn’t considered, like a physics teacher adapting a technique from a literature seminar Easy to understand, harder to ignore. That alone is useful..
Reading With a Critical Eye
The moment you open an article, notice the methodology section first. Did the author collect pre‑ and post‑test scores? Did they use surveys, focus groups, or classroom observations? Because of that, understanding the design helps you judge how transferable the findings might be to your own context. Pay attention to the limitations, too — every study has them, and spotting them early saves you from over‑applying a solution that worked only in a very specific setting.
Submitting Your Own Work
If you’ve tried something new in your course and collected even modest evidence — say, a comparison of exam averages before and after introducing a weekly reflection prompt — you have material worth sharing. The submission process typically involves:
- Preparing a manuscript that follows the journal’s guidelines (usually 2,500–5,000 words, abstract, references).
- Highlighting the inquiry — clearly state what you investigated, why it mattered, and how you measured impact.
- Including reflective narrative — JoSoTL values the teacher’s voice, so describe what surprised you, what frustrated you, and what you’d do differently next time.
- Going through peer review — expect feedback that asks for clarification on methods or requests additional data. Treat it as a conversation, not a judgment.
- Revising and resubmitting — most authors go through at least one round of edits; the goal is to make the contribution as clear and useful as possible.
Using Articles in Your Own Teaching
You don’t have to be an author to benefit. Assign a short JoSoTL piece as reading for a teaching‑assistant training session, or use the methods section as a model when you design your own small‑scale study. Some instructors even create a “journal club” where faculty meet monthly to discuss a recent article and brainstorm how to test its ideas in their courses Not complicated — just consistent..
Common Mistakes / What Most People Get Wrong
Even seasoned educators stumble when they first dip
Even seasoned educators stumble when they first dip into the JoSoTL ecosystem, often tripping over these pitfalls:
-
Misaligning the scope of the study – Submitting a piece that merely describes a classroom activity without a clear research question or that strays far from the journal’s disciplinary focus can lead to rapid rejection. Make sure the inquiry is grounded in a problem that the journal’s readership cares about Took long enough..
-
Relying on anecdotal evidence alone – A single observation or a handful of student comments, while valuable, does not constitute dependable evidence. Pair anecdotes with systematic data (e.g., test scores, survey results, or coded observations) to demonstrate impact.
-
Neglecting the reflective component – JoSoTL prizes the teacher’s voice, yet many manuscripts treat reflection as an afterthought. Omitting a candid narrative about what surprised you, what frustrated you, and how you plan to iterate weakens the scholarly contribution.
-
Overgeneralizing findings – Claiming that a technique will work across all courses or institutions without discussing contextual constraints can be misleading. Explicitly note the setting, participant demographics, and any limitations that might affect transferability The details matter here..
-
Skipping the peer‑review dialogue – Treating reviewer comments as a formality or dismissing them as “just opinions” stalls progress. Engaging thoughtfully with each point, asking clarifying questions when needed, and providing detailed responses shows professionalism and increases the likelihood of acceptance That's the whole idea..
-
Under‑estimating the revision cycle – Expecting a manuscript to be accepted on the first submission is unrealistic. Budget time for multiple rounds of editing, re‑analysis, and re‑writing; each iteration sharpens the argument and improves the quality of the final article Small thing, real impact..
Conclusion
Transitioning from a consumer of teaching resources to an active participant in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning is a rewarding journey that enriches both your practice and the broader academic community. By strategically locating relevant articles, interrogating methodology, and sharing your own evidence‑based experiences with a reflective narrative, you become a contributor rather than a passive reader. Plus, avoiding common missteps — such as misaligned scope, thin evidence, and superficial reflection — ensures that your work meets the journal’s standards and, more importantly, offers genuine insight to fellow educators. Also, embrace the iterative nature of manuscript development, view peer review as a collaborative conversation, and let the JoSoTL community guide you toward continual improvement. In doing so, you not only advance your own teaching effectiveness but also help build a collective knowledge base that shapes the future of higher education Worth keeping that in mind..
People argue about this. Here's where I land on it.
